🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to establish laws and support services to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread protest both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for additional review if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in additional EU countries